Investigation was basically analysed using SPSS 25.0. Very first descriptive analyses have been performed, as well as Cronbach’s alphas and frequencies. Digital logistic regressions were used to evaluate relationships ranging from gender, age, intimate positioning, that have a romantic/sexual companion, SNS used, sexting normalisation and you can desire to take part in sexting since independent parameters, and four sexting behaviours given that based variables. Nagelkerke’s R 2 try considered as a way of measuring effect dimensions. All details have been inserted towards design in addition. The research has also been stratified of the gender.
Incidence away from sexting behaviors
The most typical sexting behaviours are receiving (21.2%) and receiving via a mediator (28.4%), followed closely by third-team forwarding regarding intimate articles (nine.3%) and you can, finally, delivering (8.1%). Descriptive statistics are provided when you look at the Table 2.
The regression models was basically extreme. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen 2 are .42 into the “sending” design, .31 to the “receiving” design, .23 into the “third-cluster forwarding” design, and you may .17 toward “searching through a mediator” model (Dining table step three:
Regarding “sending” design, willingness so you’re able to sext (OR: 8.26; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.36-), that have an intimate/sexual lover (OR: 3.44; 95% CI: 2.25-5.25), playing with Snapchat (OR: step one.87; 95% CI: 1.19-2.93), sexual orientation (OR: 1.77; 95% CI: 1.04-step 3.00) and you will ages (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: step 1.step 14-1.63) had been somewhat regarding delivering engagement. About “receiving” design, that have an enchanting/intimate mate (OR: step three.dos7; 95% CI: 2.51-cuatro.28), readiness so you’re able to sext (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: dos.01-step three.89), playing with Instagram (OR: 1.89; 95% CI: step 1.16-step 3.10), intercourse (OR: step one.82; 95% CI: 1.37-dos.41), playing with Snapchat (OR: step 1.6step one; 95% CI: 1.dos1-2.14), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.49; 95% CI: step one.20-step 1.86) and you may decades (OR: 1.26; 95% CI: step 1.step one2-step 1.41) had been significantly pertaining to receiving involvement.
About “third-class forwarding” design, using Instagram (OR: dos.74; 95% CI: step one.1six-6.51), determination so you can sext (OR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.48-dos.72), gender (OR: 1.96; 95% CI: step one.3dos-2.91), which have an intimate/sexual lover (OR: step one.86; 95% CI: step one.dos9-dos.68), playing with Twitter (OR: step one.53; 95% CI: step 1.03-dos.26), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.09-step one.87) and you will decades (OR: step one.43; 95% CI: step one.22-1.66) was basically somewhat about involvement in the third-people forwarding.
Throughout the “receiving through an intermediary” design, playing with Instagram (OR: dos.step 16; 95% CI: 1.47-3.19), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.84; 95% CI: step one.52-2.24), which have an enchanting/intimate mate (OR: step one.71; 95% CI: step 1.35-2.17), sex (OR: step 1.4step 1; 95% CI: step one.step 11-step one.80) and you may decades (OR: step one.36; 95% CI: step one.23-1.49) was notably regarding engagement within the choosing through a mediator.
Gender variations
The newest regression activities was indeed extreme. Nagelkerke’s R dos is actually .50 for females and you can .41 to possess men with the “sending” model; .30 for girls and you may .31 having people to your “receiving” model; .18 for females and .twenty four getting guys into “third-party forwarding” model; and you will .fourteen for girls and you will .twenty-two getting guys to the “acquiring through an intermediary” model (Table cuatro:
On “sending” design, for females, willingness so you can sext (OR: ; 95% CI: -), that have a romantic/intimate mate (OR: cuatro.54; 95% CI: 2.27-9.09) and you will years (OR: step one.60; 95% CI: 1.17-dos.20) were notably pertaining to giving engagement. To have people, they were willingness so you can sext (OR: 6.05; 95% CI: 3.68-nine.94), with an intimate/sexual partner (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: 1.59-4.88) and utilizing Snapchat (OR: dos.38; 95% CI: step one.32-cuatro.29).
Regarding “receiving” design, for women, determination https://internationalwomen.net/es/mujeres-croatas/ to help you sext (OR: 5.11; 95% CI: 2.57-), having fun with Instagram (OR: 4.34; 95% CI: step one.43-), which have a romantic/intimate companion (OR: step three.77; 95% CI: 2.49-5.72), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.13-dos.33) and years (OR: step 1.42; 95% CI: step 1.step one7-1.72) were notably regarding acquiring involvement. For males, they certainly were that have an intimate/sexual spouse (OR: dos.97; 95% CI: 2.08-4.25), readiness in order to sext (OR: dos.32; 95% CI: step 1.58-step three.41), having fun with Snapchat (OR: 2.03; 95% CI: 1.38-2.91), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.40; 95% CI: step 1.06-1.86) and you will many years (OR: step one.20; 95% CI: step 1.04-step one.38).
